Justices’ Questions Suggest New York Gun-Control Law Unlikely to Survive

Since then, lower courts have generally upheld gun control laws. But they are divided on the fundamental question raised by the New York case: whether states can prevent law-abiding citizens from carrying weapons outside their homes for self-defense unless they can show the authorities a valid reason.

The question came before a court that has become more conservative since the Heller ruling.

While in court, Judge Anthony M. Kennedy turned down countless petitions challenging gun control laws to the frustration of gun rights advocates and some judges.

In 2017, Judge Clarence Thomas, along with Judge Neil M. Gorsuch, wrote that they had “discovered a disturbing trend: treating the second amendment as a discriminatory right”.

“For those of us who work in marbled halls that are constantly guarded by vigilant and dedicated police, the guarantees of the second amendment may seem out of date and superfluous,” wrote Judge Thomas. “But the designers made a clear decision: they reserved all Americans the right to carry weapons for self-defense.”

Judge Kennedy’s retirement in 2018 and his replacement by Judge Brett M. Kavanaugh, who spoke out on gun rights during his tenure before a federal appeals court in Washington, seemed to change the court’s balance. In June 2020, however, the court rejected around 10 appeals in cases under the second amendment to the constitution.

Understand the momentous concept of the Supreme Court

Map 1 of 5

The Mississippi abortion case. The court stands ready to challenge a Mississippi law that bans most abortions after 15 weeks to get Roe v. Wade, undermining and possibly overturning the 1973 decision establishing a constitutional right to abortion.

An important choice for guns. The judges will examine the constitutionality of a long-standing New York law that severely restricts the carrying of guns in public. The court has not issued a major ruling under the second amendment in more than a decade.

A decline in public support. Chief Justice Roberts now heads a court that is increasingly being associated with partiality. Recent polls show that after a spate of unusual late summer judgments in politically charged cases, the court is suffering a sharp drop in public support.

Since it only takes four votes to pass a review, there is good reason to believe that the conservative wing of the court, which then had five members, was unsure whether it could get Chief Justice Roberts’ vote.

The conservative majority in the court was strengthened a few months later with the arrival of Judge Amy Coney Barrett. In April the court agreed to hear the New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. Bruen, No. 20-843 case and answer this question: self-defense has violated the second amendment. “